Nah, is it not rather a matter of preference than one being factually better than the other?Chalk it up to inexperience then. Logic and DP, and PT etc. all have multiple automation types, touch, latch, etc. etc. This is for any mix parameter you want to use, in Live there is one. You simply have to work harder to do some things that are dead easy in Logic or DP etc. Same with things like VCA faders, you can do all of these things in Live, but it will be like wading through mud compared.You suggested to render what one created in Ableton Live to complete the mix in Logic specifically because - as you claim - it has a better automation system for mixing and mastering.
You don't at all explain what is better about its "automation system", nor do you in any way even just hint at what is specifically better about it regarding "mixing and mastering" and epecially compared to whatever other kinds of automation you were considering in contrast.
I mean: I neither use Logic nor Live, but I also never record automation - not anymore. Main reason for stopping to do so ages ago: The different modes (and having to think of/about switching them), was getting on my nerves. So if I would record automation, I'd probably prefer Live, which automatically switches between Latch and Touch depending on whether you use your mouse/trackpad or a MIDI-controller...
but rather than recording I always manually create my automation-data and I believe that unlike Live Logic doesn't have the ability to insert pre-defined curves and shrink/stretch a range of automation-data and other nice functions like that, or does it?
And still: rendering means removing automateable parameters - it seems you missed that tiny little detail in your reply.
Statistics: Posted by jens — Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:11 am