Yeah i am going to upgrade was the plan, but butbut, i am planning on doing that After i have moved, same planet though.Here's a true story here too.So even if all that could be solved, i obviously said to myself behind the scenes *screw! thath!*and installed Gdebi, and all was great again
just like that, only minor locale-whine, but thats normal.
Ps, based on a true story, don't shoot the messenger![;)]( "Wink")
I have NONE of these dependencies for bitwig 5.1.2. And I'm 99.99% certain that nothing drastic has changed regarding that since, version 4.x.So there's something basically very wrong, I'd say, with your version of bitwig. Here's the file size of the same version you are running :Code:
% ll bitwig-studio-5.1.2.deb-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 291452608 Jan 16 03:54 bitwig-studio-5.1.2.debThis is this installed version at the moment, which is 5.1.2, and the dependencies :% ldd $(which bitwig-studio)linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd0f3e3000)libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f1356d40000)librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f1356d3b000)libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f1356d36000)libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f1356c4f000)libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f1356a26000)/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f1356f00000)
% ll bitwig-studio-5.0.11.deb
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 260009852 Oct 16 18:51 bitwig-studio-5.0.11.deb
I extracted the files from the 5.0.11 .deb into a temp directory and checked out the dependencies :No big deal, simple system dependencies. No such complicated dependencies as yours. Which, by the way, are around an i386 compatibility and are obviously missing.Code:
% cd /E1/AudioProduction/Downloads-2023/TEMP/opt/bitwig-studio% ldd BitwigStudiolinux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc2ff65000)libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f7bee1c6000)librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f7bee1c1000)libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f7bee1bc000)libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f7bee0d5000)libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f7bedeac000)/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f7bee380000)
Your OS does not include those, obviously. What's needed then is to add them, which is probably what the installer app you are using did. So you shouldn't need to do that twice. What your installer app did was to also call apt-get -f to fix the dependencies.
Otherwise, manually it's :
% dpkg --add-architecture i386
% dpkg -i <bitwig deb package>
% apt-get -f install
IMHO Bitwig should fix those and make it up to date. Who runs i386 stuff today ? As far as I see it, it's Bitwig's problem to still rely on those i386 files. Using an installer app for newbies does not solve the basic problem with bitwig-studio in my opinion.
and installed Gdebi, and all was great again 
just like that, only minor locale-whine, but thats normal. 
I know for sure i have done the install with dpkg -i before, and i wanted to give you the TAL errors, i did not write it down, it will show up in the plug-in section something about hyperlinks problems, i "think".. can't be specific atm and my precious Gdebi does work so
It was a fresh clean Kubuntu 23.10 un-messed with and when i saw those msgs, i atleast found a funny thought like "wait, does Bitwig need me to install Steam first on summit, huh? install WINE, sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 (ohh, you said.. that) first or summit, huh - huh? , but, i was in a good mood so, no biggie
Thanks for your notes & time! they are SO going into my tips n trix Linux folder.
So, if i involve and use .wine/yabridge, then for now i just do the Gdebi or a distro that supports to run the flatpak through var/lib and i admit i am not up to date with flatpak permissions if something have improoved or flatpak is waiting for ME to improove..
Thank you
Ps, yeah, not even the junkyard have any i386 stuff (i hope) just a matter of time
Statistics: Posted by SmajjL — Fri Jan 26, 2024 10:47 pm