I don't really think I was engaging in the pointless anything but trying to convey my idea, up to this point.
I'm happy you framed your definition of the thing as your opinion now, and acknowledged the reductionist nature of that. Why, musically, is there a difference making all classical music (whatever that is) or jazz (whatever that means) not 'folk music'. Rhetorical question, which means putting it out there as food for thought.
the way it felt to me, with my flaws, seemed sehr condesending, then you strawmanned TF out of me for offering a sort of definition of non-conformist in the affirmative. It reads as a real insult of one's intelligence.
I'm happy you framed your definition of the thing as your opinion now, and acknowledged the reductionist nature of that. Why, musically, is there a difference making all classical music (whatever that is) or jazz (whatever that means) not 'folk music'. Rhetorical question, which means putting it out there as food for thought.
the way it felt to me, with my flaws, seemed sehr condesending, then you strawmanned TF out of me for offering a sort of definition of non-conformist in the affirmative. It reads as a real insult of one's intelligence.
Statistics: Posted by jancivil — Sun Dec 22, 2024 10:31 pm