OK spoon feeding you, I mentioned environmentally friendly low power consuming consumer grade chips as a natural incentive marketing wise in a world where most people accept man made climate change as real, you and others are so sensitive about your idiotic takes on the subject itself that the idea of marketing to a majority of consumers meant you needed to flip the f*ck out about it even being brought up and argue about it.Thanks for simplifying it for me, I needed it.
But what topic are you actually on about, mate? Christians, climate change, or the holocaust? You've brought up quite a bit.
I thought this was about MS, ARM chips, integrated NPMs, LLMs and the like....
You're definitely right about maths being awesome though!
Math is a amazing, when 97% of the people in a given profession agree it's what most of us call an insurmountable amount of not anecdotal, but peer reviewed, evidence. It also illustrates when people think their take is as important as science, how sadly the internet didn't make us smarter, it just gave idiotic ideas echo chambers of misinformation to bolster our dumb takes with.
Back to the topic, as seen in the anecdotal evidence given stating that Arm isn't capable of beating x86 in terms of energy consumption for the same CPU power. The math on it works out, Arm should be and is in most cases beating comparable x86 chips in thermals. You can go online and find people arguing that it's not the case, but it isn't a practical conclusion, it's political, i.e. driven by alignments.
Statistics: Posted by machinesworking — Wed May 22, 2024 8:09 pm