Tried, pretty good job with WT editor, and sounds ok. But as for me the general thing that comes to mind when see WT variant it's owning Falcon, which covers all WT needs, despite not has fulldied table editor, but it's not critical. Since by sound in detuned/spreaded WT he still top.Well, frankly i would not say that this is instant, was not fan of v2 by sound abilities (only by UI, that was amazing, and now it seemed to me like faded a little (due to "vectorize" or someting), or im mistake ?).
Almost 40 bucks it's not quite nobrain, rather pretty fair for one-two two good features. In general need check.
Noticeable also that Imposcar 3 seems has a bit more cpu footprint than Falcon with similar poly\release scenario. (well it's at least with single WT module in Falcon + adsr resp, ofcourse i not recreated whole Imposcar path. But this at least shows that not all so bad with Falcon CPU eating).
Just thoughts out loud. Separately from that, Imposcar 3 quite good\desirable.
(Btw seemed a bit strange that was not able to try classic sequences presets (of v2) in demo, can say one of most tasty sides of Imposcar, who know mb i would change my mind heh).
Statistics: Posted by c_voltage — Sun May 19, 2024 7:59 pm
